Antitrust
Navigate forward to interact with the calendar and select a date. Press the question mark key to get the keyboard shortcuts for changing dates.
Navigate backward to interact with the calendar and select a date. Press the question mark key to get the keyboard shortcuts for changing dates.
ITIF’s Schumpeter Project on Competition Policy conducts legal and economic research, publishes actionable policy analysis, organizes high-level discussions, and engages with policymakers to rethink the relationship between competition and innovation for the benefit of consumers, innovative companies, the economy, and society.

Director, Schumpeter Project on Competition Policy
Information Technology and Innovation Foundation
Read BioMore Publications and Events
April 10, 2025|Events
The DOJ v. Google Saga Continues: What’s at Stake in the Search Remedies Trial?
Please join ITIF for a virtual panel with top experts who will discuss the key issues going to trial, the implications for Google and the future of search, and what the case means for U.S. antitrust law and the broader “big tech” debate.
March 7, 2025|Blogs
The Global Spread of Protectionist Policies That Squeeze American Tech Companies
A growing proliferation of antitrust regulations, content-moderation requirements, data-localization mandates, digital service taxes, exorbitant fines and fees, and local content requirements reveals a clear pattern: They are designed to unfairly burden and extract revenue from American Big Tech.
March 4, 2025|Events
Competition Policy in the Trump Administration: The Future of Conservative Antitrust and the FTC
Watch the webinar event where panlists discussed how antitrust enforcement might change with the new administration, whether the Trump enforcers will carry forward any of the neo-Brandeisian policies, and what the future may have in store for the FTC.
March 4, 2025|Op-Eds & Contributed Articles
Korea’s Digital Gamble: Will New Tech Rules Hurt Innovation and Help China?
South Korea risks harming its consumers, economy, and relationship with the United States by adopting Europe's flawed digital competition regulations.
February 28, 2025|Blogs
The Tech Oligarchy That Isn’t: Big Tech’s Power Is Overstated
Critics on both sides of the aisle view the “private power” of dominant tech firms as unassailable and protected by anticompetitive conduct, but their alleged monopoly power is often overstated.
February 28, 2025|Blogs
UK Antitrust Enforcers Target Google in Inaugural DMCC Investigation
The Competition and Markets Authority’s looming decision to label Google with significant market status is the first step in a process that threatens to degrade the British consumer experience without achieving meaningful benefits to competition.
February 26, 2025|Op-Eds & Contributed Articles
The EU’s Competitiveness Compass: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly?
The European Commission’s Competitiveness Compass rightly identifies Europe’s economic and innovation challenges but proposes misguided solutions.
February 26, 2025|Testimonies & Filings
Comments to the Australian Treasury Regarding Proposal of a New Digital Competition Regime
By deciding not to pursue digital competition regulation, Australia can avoid the problems that are already materializing as a result of ex-ante regimes like the EU’s DMA.
February 24, 2025|Blogs
The Merger Guidelines Memoranda: An Opening Blunder by the Trump Administration
The possibility of a new bipartisan consensus based on the Biden administration’s failed merger policies should concern Senate Republicans.
February 7, 2025|Testimonies & Filings
Comments to New Zealand’s Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment Regarding Review of the Commerce Act of 1986
While ITIF commends the MBIE for analyzing the efficacy of its current regime, substantial changes to New Zealand’s competition laws should be a response to clear market failures that improves consumer welfare, and not merely an attempt to keep up with perceived global or regional trends.