ITIF Logo
ITIF Search

Internet

As every sector of the global economy and nearly every facet of modern society undergo digital transformation, ITIF advocates for policies that spur not just the development of IT innovations, but more importantly their adoption and use throughout the economy. In the area of Internet policy, ITIF's work covers issues related to taxation, e-commerce, digital copyright, global Internet governance, and digital currencies.

Alex Ambrose
Alex Ambrose

Policy Analyst

Read Bio
Ayesha Bhatti
Ayesha Bhatti

Head of Digital Policy, UK & EU

Center for Data Innovation

Read Bio
Daniel Castro
Daniel Castro

Vice President and Director, Center for Data Innovation

Information Technology and Innovation Foundation

Read Bio
Eli Clemens
Eli Clemens

Policy Analyst

Center for Data Innovation

Read Bio
Ash Johnson
Ash Johnson

Senior Policy Manager

Information Technology and Innovation Foundation

Read Bio

Featured

How Congress Can Foster a Digital Single Market in America

How Congress Can Foster a Digital Single Market in America

In areas ranging from data privacy to content moderation, states are creating patchworks of regulation that confuse consumers, complicate compliance, and undermine the digital economy. It’s time for Congress to step in and establish a consistent national approach to digital policy.

How to Address Political Speech on Social Media in the United States

How to Address Political Speech on Social Media in the United States

Policymakers could improve content moderation on social media by building international consensus on content moderation guidelines, providing more resources to address state-sponsored disinformation, and increasing transparency in content moderation decisions.

Section 230 Series: The Law’s History, Its Impact, Its Problems (Real and Imagined), and the Path Forward for Reform

Section 230 Series: The Law’s History, Its Impact, Its Problems (Real and Imagined), and the Path Forward for Reform

In a comprehensive analysis, ITIF concludes any reform to Section 230 should preserve the fundamental principle that liability for content should reside with the content creator while also ensuring online platforms are held responsible for their own conduct.

More Publications and Events

January 21, 2025|Events

The Worst Tech Policies of 2024: How the New Administration and Congress Can Turn the Page

Please join ITIF for a virtual panel discussion with technology policy experts who will highlight and critique the most counterproductive tech policies of the past year, and consider how the incoming administration and Congress can turn the page.

January 16, 2025|Blogs

Disconnected Progress: The Hidden Price of Internet Restrictions in Pakistan

Pakistan's frequent Internet shutdowns, justified by the government as measures to address political unrest, have significantly harmed the nation's economy, with estimated losses ranging from $892 million to $1.6 billion in 2024. To preserve economic activity and social value, policymakers should explore alternative approaches to addressing security concerns without restricting Internet access.

January 16, 2025|Blogs

Meta Community Notes and Content Moderation in a Free Market

Meta announced on January 7, 2025 that it was ending its third-party fact-checking program on its social media platforms—Facebook, Instagram, and Threads—and moving to a “Community Notes” model, similar to X, in the United States.

January 14, 2025|Blogs

The Online Streaming Act Will Cost Canadians

Canadian consumers should not have to bear the costs of the Online Streaming Act. If the creation and promotion of Canadian content is a societal goal, then it should be funded by the government.

January 8, 2025|Blogs

Trump Should Create a Verification Regime to Ensure Chinese E-Commerce Platforms Comply With Protections Against Forced Labor

Policymakers should aim for a balanced approach to complying with the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA)—ensuring that platforms are transparent about their supply chains, while also preventing bad actors from exploiting the system.

January 6, 2025|Testimonies & Filings

Amicus Brief Regarding TikTok, Inc. v. Garland

Banning Americans from accessing a social media application that millions use every day is unprecedented in our country. If the such a ban goes into effect, it will cause a far-reaching disruption in Americans’ ability to engage with the content and audiences of their choice online.

December 31, 2024|Testimonies & Filings

Response to the Electronic Transactions Development Agency’s Consultation Regarding Digital Markets and Competition

Thailand’s emerging digital markets are driven by innovation, growth, and the spirit of entrepreneurship. Hastily adopting the PEA as proposed risks introducing unnecessary regulatory burdens, fostering regulatory capture, and stifling innovation without clear evidence of market failure.

December 17, 2024|Events

Techlash 2025: The Outlook for Tech Policy in the Trump Administration

Watch now for an online presentation and discussion with Robert D. Atkinson and David Moschella, co-authors of Technology Fears and Scapegoats: 40 Myths About Privacy, Jobs, AI, and Today’s Innovation Economy.

December 16, 2024|Blogs

Eight Ways the New Administration Can Pursue a Post-Techlash Agenda

There is a huge opportunity to change the technology narrative of recent years, making it less about fear, potential downsides and things to blame, and more about national development, competitiveness, and prosperity in an “America First” context.

December 12, 2024|Blogs

The FTC’s Social Media Data Practices Report Is a House of Cards Built on False Assumptions and Unsubstantiated Claims

The FTC’s September 2024 staff report on the data practices of nine major social media and video streaming companies makes four flawed claims: that platforms surveil users, secretly share data with advertisers, collect data to block competitors, and limit consumer choice due to insufficient competition.

Back to Top